Free Speech Or Hate Crime?

A couple days ago I saw a picture on Twitter I saw what was perhaps the best means of resistance to an oppressive institution: an LGBT-rainbow-colored house across the street from the Westboro Baptist Church. A house that not only sends a powerful and eye-catching message, but also manages to do some real good for those marginalized in the community and by its neighbor across the road, who is probably most famous for its anti-gay protests at military funerals.

IIJuUJ0

I read this article on Salon(http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/rainbow_equality_house_moves_in_across_the_street_from_westboro_baptist_compound/) which gives a basic summary of the man who bought the house and painted it to simultaneously make fun of and resist the Westboro Baptist church’s hate tactics as well as provide a space in which everyone, specifically members of the LGBT community, can feel welcome. It’s a way of carving out indefinite space and redefining who is important and who matters against an oppressive power, and taking that power back. Not to mention it’s hilarious at the same time and mocking everything that Westboro Baptist believes in and stands for.

They’re going to have to look at that house and digest what those colors mean everyday, and good for the owner for pushing back and doing this on their territory.

I laughed when I saw this article and it immediately made me think of another similar news story that hits close to home: the University of Toronto Men’s Rights club. This is a club that has held lectures about why Women and Gender Studies should be eliminated from all university curriculums–their main argument being that they don’t consider it to be academic material–and has managed to book venues through the university to disseminate their hateful messages, under the guise of “equality”.

Like Westboro Baptist, I find this group to be a joke. How contradictory is it to try to eliminate another group’s right to exist? Even if it is morally wrong to discriminate or not like someone for their identity, it’s a whole other level when there’s a desire to eliminate: it’s this kind of mentality that leads to terrible things like genocides. Yes, the Men’s Rights group should have the right to an opinion, but when it’s hateful it no longer becomes free speech. When it impinges on someone else’s right to be the person that they are and express themselves, or tries to rid someone’s existence, it is no longer free, because it is taking someone else’s freedom.

There were many protests and debates surrounding this organization at U of T, with the official student union even blasting the university for enabling a student group like this to be recognized as legitimate since it is one mainly based on the suppression of marginalized voices in the community. To some extent I agree but I also think it’s important to have these groups that test our limits and force us to resist: at least they aren’t lying about their purpose or views so that people can be clear about how to fight back against it.

Equality House, however, is the ultimate way of fighting back. It sends a stronger message than any protest ever could and best of all it uses humor as a tactic in dismantling a problematic institution’s views. Maybe the student union and feminist groups at U of T should follow suit and print some funny posters or something, let this Men’s Rights group know that we are not easily fazed.

Advertisements

About The Girl on Bloor

I'm a busy 20-something about town living in downtown Toronto and creating fun, easy recipes for those on the go!
This entry was posted in Critical Perspective, News, Shaking My Head All Day and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Free Speech Or Hate Crime?

  1. Very true. And I applaud the residents of that house for making such an effective point.

  2. David M. Green says:

    Re: I laughed when I saw this article and it immediately made me think of another similar news story that hits close to home: the University of Toronto Men’s Rights club. This is a club that has held lectures about why Women and Gender Studies should be eliminated from all university curriculums–their main argument being that they don’t consider it to be academic material–and has managed to book venues through the university to disseminate their hateful messages, under the guise of “equality”.

    ____________________

    First off feminist isn’t academic material – is a hate movement that uses outright lies and myths to convince politicians to pass law that abridge and do away with the rights men have in regards to employment, the family, their property and children. Just as the owner of the house chose to take a stand against religious hatred and tyranny by painting his house in support of the LGBT community. The University of Toronto Men’s Rights club is standing up to the misandry – hatred of men – and academic tyranny practiced on behalf of the feminists at the University of Toronto.

  3. David M. Green says:

    Reblogged this on Autumn Leaves and commented:
    First off feminist isn’t academic material – is a hate movement that uses outright lies and myths to convince politicians to pass law that abridge and do away with the rights men have in regards to employment, the family, their property and children. Just as the owner of the house chose to take a stand against religious hatred and tyranny by painting his house in support of the LGBT community. The University of Toronto Men’s Rights club is standing up to the misandry – hatred of men – and academic tyranny practiced on behalf of the feminists at the University of Toronto.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s